Tuesday, October 9, 2012

How have American writers critiqued the idea of American Exceptionalism?

               "Be true!  Be true! Be true! Show freely to the world, if not your worst, yet some trait whereby the worst may be inferred!"(p. 224).  So says Nathaniel Hawthorne in the conclusion of his romance, The Scarlet Letter.  Over the course of his 183 page work, Hawthorne introduces us to the Puritans of seventeenth-century Boston, who claim to have good conduct, and to be pious, just, and frugal followers of Christ.  However, by the end he manages to knock all of these adjectives out of the Puritan self-definition, replacing them with sinful, hypocritical, and self-righteous.  
               Arthur Dimmesdale, the young minister, is revered by his fellow Puritans, and "enshrined within the stainless sanctity of"(p. 191) the hearts of the blossoming women of society.  However, it is Arthur Dimmesdale who participates in the blackest sin of adultery, and worse, cannot bring himself to confess.  He continues to captivate the congregation, reluctantly loves Hester whom he has made polluted love to, and denies the hand of his own child at "noon-tide"(p.134).   Thus Arthur Dimmesdale, the blessed Reverend, is most sinful and a hypocrite to boot.  
               Puritan Christianity is Christianity nonetheless, a faith centered on forgiveness.  It is therefore hypocritical for the Puritans to enforce Hester's daily torture of the scarlet letter without reprieve.  Even at the end of Dimmesdale's miserable earthly existence, the townspeople "tormented Hester Prynne, perhaps more than all the rest, with their cool, well-acquainted gaze at her familiar shame"(p. 214).  It is much more hypocritical that Dimmesdale's revelation of his own scarlet letter is met by the elders with either unbelief or higher reverence, seeing his confession as "a parable, in order to impress on his admirers the mighty and mournful lesson, that, in the view of Infinite Purity, we are sinners all alike"(p. 224).  While Hester is put down day after day, Dimmesdale remains silent and respected until the end, when he is raised up all the higher by his meager demonstration of humility.
               As for frugality, Hawthorne's Puritans are only so in name.  While Pearl, in the golden-red splendor wrought by her mother's artful needlework reminds Governor Bellingham of his "days of vanity" and appears to him a child "of the Lord of Misrule"(p.97), he is much at fault in line of decadence.  He is introduced in chapter 3 wearing "a dark feather in his hat, a border of embroidery on his cloak, and a black velvet tunic beneath"(p. 59).  All of 4 chapters later, Hester delivers him a pair of gloves, "fringed and embroidered to his order"(p. 89).  The Puritan elders in chapter 21, altogether now, "deemed it a duty... to assume the outward state and majesty, which, in accordance with antique style, was looked upon as the proper garb of public or social eminence"(p.201).  The elders are evidently comfortable with wearing luxurious clothing whenever they have a reason to, which is always, due to their rank in society, thus demonstrating their sinfulness and hypocriticalness.  However, it is not only the elders, but the whole town that lies to itself, clothed by Hester's needlework while shaming her with the embroidered letter on her breast.
               While the Puritans follow good conduct, they readily interact with rogue seamen.  The people of society are expected to conform to the law, "But the sea" made no "attempts at regulation by human law" and so the Puritan elders "smiled not unbenignantly at the clamor and rude deportment of these jolly seafaring men"(203).  Hawthorne further critiques the Puritan elders in his belief that they would fit right into the British elite, that "the mother country need not have been ashamed to see these foremost men of an actual democracy adopted into the House of Peers, or made the Privy Council of the sovereign"(206).  
               Ultimately, the Puritans are much like the British before them, only more sombre in deportment and more harsh in punishment, which leads to Hawthorne's mighty conclusion that the Puritans of The Scarlet Letter are ungodly, hypocritical and self-righteous, the very opposites of the adjectives they use to describe themselves.

4 comments:

  1. This was a great essay. I completely agree with you, and I think it's partly because of your very clear argument. The way you organized it was great too because with each paragraph I was given more (very convincing) evidence and analysis that revolved around a central point. I like how you compared Dimmesdale's treatment to Hester's when all was out on the table and how the seamen were actually significant characters, though subtle. And while you didn't actually re-state the question you were trying to answer I understood that you were referring to Hawthorne as an author critiquing the priggishness of the Puritans he wrote about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really liked your essay. I thought what you were saying was really clear, as well as well put. I liked how you focused on "The Scarlet Letter" and used its text really well to support your thesis. I really liked the beginning and how I was pulled into the essay right away. I, like Katherine, think that the way that you used Dimmesdale's treatment as a comparison to Hester's was very well done. Just keep in mind that citations are put at the end of sentences, rather than the middle. Most of all, I enjoyed you pointing out the hypocrisy of the Puritans. It was an engaging essay that I really enjoyed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a really well-written and straight-forward essay that I enjoyed reading.I agree with Eliza in that your opinion was very clear with no ambivalence. I like how you have a very set stance on the hyprocrisy of Puritans and you effectively use that stance to drive your essay forward. Your examples from the Scarlet Letter were well thought out and related to your essay. Great organization to the essay as you put forth a point, provided evidence then analyzed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a really good essay and I enjoyed reading it. You did a very good job pointing out the hypocrisy that Hawthorne makes the Puritans have in order to critique American exceptionalism. I agree with the other commenters that your argument is very clear and you use very good evidence. The only thing I could suggest to you is possibly paraphrasing more and quoting less, because at times it feels like you're just trying to stuff in as many direct quotes as possible.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.